Personality Characteristics of Soldiers Introduction The exposure to an imminent or actual danger usually leads to various psychological reactions that vary depending on the personality structure of the individual. In the context of combat, warriors are extensively exposed to such situations with some eventually exhibiting various psychological disorders including major depressive, adjustment and acute stress disorders. These usually culminate into post-deployment physical and mental ailments that are common among soldiers who have experienced some level of violence.
One will risk being roundly condemned if he, or she, points out the serious bottleneck that Internet friend or foe essay presented when a community attempts, through the democratic process, to set plans for positive social action.
A man is not permitted to hesitate about its merits, without the suspicion of being a friend to tyranny, that is, of being a foe to mankind? What is likely required for the masses of people, as we see in "modern" world societies, is an established system of government.
Where there is a need for an established system of government, it will likely naturally come about; and do so, whether, or not, it has the consent of the people, -- real or imagined. Putting aside, for the moment, the arguments of Hobbes and LockeI believe, on the basis of plain historical fact, that governments come about naturally and maintain themselves naturally without the general will of the people; indeed, I believe, with many others I suspect, that our long established democratic governments in the world the United States and Canada being among them did not come about by the general will of the people, at all; nor is it necessary that it should it be maintained by the will of the people.
It may not be. What is necessary for optimum prosperity is a state of acquiescence, which, as it happens, is the hallmark of western democracies. It may be, that the only thing needed is but the trappings of democracy.
An individual or group of individuals may take and maintain power by the use of coercive force. From history we can see that this is the usual way by which power is gained, and maintained. However, it has long been understood that people might come together and explicitly agree to put someone in power.
The best of the thinkers saw a process, -- call it democracy -- by which groups might bloodlessly choose a leader. That each of the governed should have a say, or least an opportunity to have a say, is a high flying ideal; but any system by which the peace is kept is an admirable system and democracy, such as it has evolved, has proven, in many cases, to be just such a system.
A precise definition of democracy might be had by consulting the OED. Democracy is government by the people; a form of government in which the sovereign power resides in the people as a whole, and is exercised either directly by them as in the small republics of antiquity or by officers elected by them.
In modern use it vaguely denotes a social state in which all have equal rights, without hereditary or arbitrary differences of rank or privilege.
Walter Bagehot gave it a more uncelestial definition: Any word might be added to this suffix, which will then indicate the type of rule, such as: Democracy is the rule by, or the dominion of, the people; it comes from the Greek word, demos.
It is often referred to as popular government. Democracy, historically speaking, is to be compared with monarchy, rule of one; or with aristocracy, rule of the "best-born," or rule of the nobles. Whatever its origins and we will consider its origins democracy has come to mean a principle or system to which most all political parties of the western world, no matter their political beliefs, would subscribe.
It goes beyond the periodic act of voting; it is characterized by participation in government, viz. In his capacity as a history writer, Aristotlein his work, The Athenian Constitution BCwrites that the Athenians practiced democracy only to the extent of putting and keeping in power members of a very exclusive group, a group which formed but a minority in the universal group we stylize as society.
The Athenian constitution was oligarchical, in every respect. The poorer classes were the serfs of the rich. They cultivated the lands of the rich and paid rent.
The whole country was in the hands of nine magistrates, called archons, who were elected according to qualifications of birth and wealth.Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do. Personality Characteristics of Soldiers.
Personality Characteristics of Soldiers. Introduction. The exposure to an imminent or actual danger usually leads to various psychological reactions that vary depending on the personality structure of the individual.
THE FOUR TYPES OF PARAGRAPHS (With Examples) There are four types of paragraphs we write. They include: narrative, informative, descriptive, and persuasive.
View this essay on Friend or Foe. Israel collects intelligence on American foreign policy related to Israel and the Middle East as well as on scientific and Essay Friend or Foe and 90,+ more term papers written by professionals and your peers.
Another great essay. I enjoy your writing so much Mr. Kingsworth– its like having my innermost feelings, thoughts and ideas given voice in . A friend of mine had a question about if the internet was a friend or foe to democracy as a prompt for an essay, and the idea caught my interest so I wrote my own take on it.