These late second and third century authors use such terms not to refer to the one God, but rather to refer to the plurality of the one God, together with his Son on Word and his Spirit. Nor did they consider these to be equally divine. A common strategy for defending monotheism in this period is to emphasize the unique divinity of the Father.
Related Media Introduction Because the word trinity is never found in the Bible some wonder about whether this is a biblical doctrine or not, but the absence of a term used to describe a doctrine does not necessarily mean the term is not biblical.
The issue is, does the term accurately reflect what the Scripture teaches? In reality, due to the incomprehensible nature of the truth this term reflects, some believe it is a poor word to describe exactly what the Bible teaches us about this truth concerning God.
The goal is to investigate the facts of Scripture so one can see from the process of investigation presented in this study just what the Bible teaches us about how God exists. Historically, the church has believed that He exists in Holy Trinity or Triunity.
The tri-personality of God is exclusively a Christian doctrine and a truth of Scripture. It is this doctrine that will be investigated in what follows. Our purpose, then, is to demonstrate that the doctrine of the trinity triunity of the Godhead is another biblical revelation that teaches us more about the nature of God or how He exists.
It lies outside the realm of natural reason or human logic. Walter Martin points out: No man can fully explain the Trinity, though in every age scholars have Doctrine of the trinity theories and advanced hypotheses to explore this mysterious Biblical teaching.
But despite the worthy efforts of these scholars, the Trinity is still largely incomprehensible to the mind of man.
Perhaps the chief reason for this is that the Trinity is a-logical, or beyond logic. It, therefore, cannot be made subject to human reason or logic.
Because of this, opponents of the doctrine argue that the idea of the Trinity must be rejected as untenable. The ultimate issue as always is, does the biblical evidence support the doctrine of the Trinity or tri-personality of God?
If biblical evidence supports it, we can know it is true. Comprehending it is another matter. In Isaiah, God tells us about this and says: It follows from all this that we cannot and should not expect to understand the Bible exhaustively. If we could, the Bible would not be divine but limited to human intelligence.
A very important idea comes out of this, something over which many non-Christians and even Christians stumble: Since the Bible is an infinite revelation, it often brings the reader beyond the limit of his intelligence.
As simple as the Bible is in its message of sin and of free salvation in Christ, an incredible subtlety and profundity underlies all its doctrines. Even a child can receive Christ as his Savior, thereby appropriating the free gift of eternal life.
Yet no philosopher has more than scratched the surface regarding the things that happened at the Cross.
The Bible forces any reader to crash into the ceiling of his own comprehension, beyond which he cannot go until he sees the Lord face-to-face. Moses expressed this to us in Deuteronomy It is the Greek word musterion and refers to what was previously hidden, but is now revealed to us through the revelation of the Word 1 Cor.
Sometimes it is used simply of that which God makes known through His revelation to man which man could not know on his own 1 Cor.
The Apostle Paul wrote: Such, Paul said, was the contrast between the imperfect time in which he then wrote and the perfect time which awaited him and the church when the partial reflection of the present would give way to the splendor of perfect vision.
Then Paul would see God cf. Then partial knowledge cf. When seeking to explain those truths that fall into this category, our explanations and especially our attempts to illustrate them must of necessity fall short of our ability to clarify and comprehend them.
Does this mean a doctrine cannot be true simply because it defies our human imagination or ability to comprehend it? The answer is, of course not. It would be nothing short of human arrogance to say it was. This does not mean we do not test the Scripture to make sure these things are truly taught, but once we are convinced that that is what the Bible says, we must lay hold of it by faith and wait on the eternal future for complete understanding.The doctrine of the Trinity stands front and center of the Christian faith and its articulation.
After a sustained drought of trinitarian engagement, the doctrine of the Trinity has increasingly resurged to the forefront of Evangelical confession.
The doctrine of the Trinity stands front and center of the Christian faith and its articulation. After a sustained drought of trinitarian engagement, the doctrine of the Trinity has increasingly resurged to the forefront of Evangelical confession.
The word katechesis means instruction by word of mouth, especially by questioning and answering. The Apostle insists upon 'doctrine' as one of the most important duties of a bishop.
Introduction · Post-Apostolic Age (AD ) · Greek Apologists (AD ) · Old Catholic Age (AD ) · Arianism and the Road to the Council of Nicea · After Nicea: The Road to Constantinople · The Council of Constantinople · Conclusion · Relavence to the Modern Believer.
Introduction. There has never been a doctrine so widely embraced as that of trinitarianism. commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.
Amen." Further 1 John states "For there are three that bear record in heaven, the. The Doctrine of the Trinity: Christianity's Self-Inflicted Wound [Sir Anthony Buzzard, Charles F. Hunting] on iridis-photo-restoration.com *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers.
This important work is a detailed biblical investigation of the relationship of Jesus to the one God of Israel. The authors challenge the notion that biblical monotheism is legitimately .